criticism undesirable A good example of how to deal with criticism Hoffenheim
occurred in autumn 2008. Published on 24/09/2008 Lorenz Maroldt a critical commentary under the title "First League, two classes of Hoffenheim in the Tagesspiegel. Since the comment that "particularly valuable" deserves, he is also related to orientation in the blog under "Links to important external references. But further in the text. What was Now the excitement, which triggered a small avalanche? In the above comment made Lorenz Maroldt "
on Lex Hopp and abuse in football stadium " some remarks.
http://www.tagesspiegel.de/meinung/kommentare/auf-den-punkt/Hoffenheim; art15890, 2621698 amazement was noted that the abuse against Mr. Hopp and Hoffenheim, in the course of the game against Dortmund (keyword "cross-transparent") has responded so quickly and violently.
had to suffer Mr. Hopp, say, more than, for example Oliver Kahn Gerald Asamoah Hoeness or in the past? 
The frenzy of activity by the DFB, Theo Zwanziger in the person of
, could be possibly explained by the fact that Ralf Zwanziger manages (the son of Chief DFB) in Hoffenheim, the women's section. Nuisance hereby as the fast activism? Surprise was expressed by the ad
Mr. Hopp against the 19-year-old who had held the crosshair transparent.
How then reacts Hoffenheim? Left a critical comment in the jungle of world news? Not at all. Hoffenheim
decided to boycott the Tagesspiegel . Mr. Sieger, spokesman for Hoffenheim asked the understanding "that future requests of the Tagesspiegel We will not be considered. "
http://www.tagesspiegel.de/sport/Fussball-Hoffenheim-Bundesliga, art133, 2625816 Hoffenheim refused to give the impression that one" would be thin-skinned "but the concern something to put right was given. This results in the aforementioned boycott of the newspaper, asking it to understand.
Lorenz Maroldt could not share this understanding as he Press Officer, consider the requests do not want that something strange took place. "
you have not - understood absolutely nothing - really amazing in your position. Or do not understand what the cause but makes little better "
Even the mirror was this dispute as an opportunity to comment as follows:
." One may find the text unfair, maybe even track, a polemical little. But one thing he is in any case covered by the basic right to freedom of expression and the need for press freedom. Most
Bundesliga clubs have had to defend in its history been such a clear criticism - and that for some months. "
http://www.spiegel.de/sport/fussball/0, 1518,581571,00. Html equal once achieved the Basic Law, including basic rights and freedom of expression. No small guns.
Even the honorable took time become aware of and wrote "In the subject of sovereignty in any case need to quickly offended
Hoffenheim obviously tuition. For winner letter to the daily mirror, fits them into a series of thin-skinned http://www.zeit.de/online/2008/41/medienboykott Hoffenheim reactions "
Mr. Hopp was a week later Guest
in DSF-two . This opportunity for the Tagesspiegel took the occasion to the described dispute to philosophize about the quality of public reporting. To make it short, especially good, the DSF is not cut, as is clear from the title "
Wontorras soft round " blaspheme guess. This time Mark Hessel man said with a loud "
Yawn! "
http://www.tagesspiegel.de/sport/Fussball-Dietmar-Hopp-Hoffenheim-Bundesliga; criticized art133, 2629016 the lack of specific questions was" Lex Hopp, "the trial of the German Football Association, invective from the stands against Hoffenheim to prevent patron legally. No word on
Ralf Zwanziger . The son of the DFB chief Theo Zwanziger uses in Hoffenheim, while his father is in this case with uncharacteristic speed DFB-insults the stadium looks. No word
also boycott threat , with Hoffenheim on a critical comment on these specific topics in the Tagesspiegel responded. In Internet forums, and media on the part of the case in recent days has been discussed extensively.
The DSF was probably because offline. "
Well, for that I'm online and can tell you this story. criticism to say there is the authoritarian mind of Mr. Hopper in the above article was "as if he
fans turn to their team in protest at the stadium's back, with perpetrators equate ."
This is, unfortunately, also nothing new. After
