the influence of Mr. Hopper and his money. This topic has been discussed ever since the "Project - Hoffenheim" in the public perception was. It has been repeatedly pointed out that Mr Hopper wants only good things and dominate the club does not want and can. Apparently many fans not only see the different :
http://www.focus.de/sport/fussball/bundesliga1/tsg-1899-hoffenheim-geld-schiesst-tore_aid_355856.html
" Jochen Lammert, scientists at the University of Muenster and an expert in finance in professional football has studied meticulously Hopps commitment. And accuses the club a messy interpretation of the rules: "In Hoffenheim are faced with complex economic dependencies against an individual donor. . Therefore, Dietmar Hopp has a dominant influence - without that he holds the formal vote majority, ""
http://www.focus.de/sport/fussball/bundesliga1/tsg-1899-hoffenheim-geld-schiesst-tore_aid_355856.html
" Jochen Lammert, scientists at the University of Muenster and an expert in finance in professional football has studied meticulously Hopps commitment. And accuses the club a messy interpretation of the rules: "In Hoffenheim are faced with complex economic dependencies against an individual donor. . Therefore, Dietmar Hopp has a dominant influence - without that he holds the formal vote majority, ""
the complete article Focus including an interview you can also view a pdf, namely here: http:/
. / www1.wiwi.uni-muenster.de/fakultaet/aktuelles/2008/12/26/FUSSBALLfertig.pdf
are there other versions to be found on the following topics: breach against the guiding principles of the licensing procedure the DFL, careless rule interpretation and economic dependencies, speculation gains , slash 50 +1 rule and the one yet should think again about the integrity of the competition .
Very calm, with the obvious dependence between Mr. Hopp and Hoffenheim also once illuminated by an expert and commented. Just curious, that one by Hoffenheim again and again vehemently against any of them blocked. Why, if this is so obvious the case? Fits well not heal so well into the picture and the cleaner world which one wants to play for us.
also interesting in this context that this article of December 2008 is. So far earlier than Mr Hopper spoke publicly about the extent of his involvement.
http://anti-hoffenheim.blogspot.com/2009/01/hopp-gab-175-millionen.html
Very calm, with the obvious dependence between Mr. Hopp and Hoffenheim also once illuminated by an expert and commented. Just curious, that one by Hoffenheim again and again vehemently against any of them blocked. Why, if this is so obvious the case? Fits well not heal so well into the picture and the cleaner world which one wants to play for us.
also interesting in this context that this article of December 2008 is. So far earlier than Mr Hopper spoke publicly about the extent of his involvement.
http://anti-hoffenheim.blogspot.com/2009/01/hopp-gab-175-millionen.html
0 comments:
Post a Comment